Integrity › The refusals

WE FOUND A PRICE.
WE’RE NOT SHOWING IT.

Every product below has a price we could have printed. We are not printing it, because our record of what the product is contradicts the listing the price came from. The contradiction is stated for each one, in full, so you can decide whether we were right.

Withheld
from /api/withheld
Products in the archive
from /api/withheld
Share refused
 
Observations kept
from /api/stats
The basis

WITHHELD,
NEVER DELETED.

Loading the rule this page is applying…
basis — /api/withheld
Where we refuse

SOME CATEGORIES
ARE HARDER THAN OTHERS.

Loading per-category counts…

Every refusal

WHAT WE ASKED FOR,
WHAT WE FOUND INSTEAD.

Loading the withheld list…

A refusal that needs no opinion

ONE SHELF SLOT,
TWO PRODUCTS.

Withheld, explained or not

Two products on one catalogue row. At least one match is wrong and nothing says which, so every binding to that row goes and both products show no price. A collision we cannot explain is still withheld — when we measured, most of the ones we could not explain were different products anyway.

One product, seeded twice

The only thing that keeps a price up: proof the two entries are the same product written twice. Exact words, nothing looser — a GoPro HERO13 Black is a word-for-word subset of the Creator Edition, and they are not the same camera.

WHAT THIS PAGE
DOES NOT CLAIM.

Not a claim the seller is wrong

The listing is usually a real product at a real price. The mismatch is between that listing and the item our record says we were asked about. We withhold because we cannot tell you which of the two you meant.

Refusals are about identity, not honesty

Not a deletion

Not permanent

A refusal lifts the moment the contradiction resolves — a listing that states the model, a size that appears, a mount that matches. Nothing here is a verdict on the product.

Re-checked on every observation batch